![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hand Breakdown vs. Dealers Up Card Weird Plays Made Right It is a huge possibility right now that you are thinking you know all there is to know about a Hard 14 vs. the Dealers Ace. On the other hand, how am I to know who already owns the There are plays made in this game that just don't make any sense at all. Don't try to figure them out, because that is what the Playing 21 Program is meant to do. Let it do its job to find the answers while you are playing elsewhere. The Hand Breakdown vs. Dealers Up Card is a very dominant thing. It is so powerful that it was termed the DNA of Blackjack. Don't take our word for it, read through Here we have another fun example of the game Blackjack. We just set up the Playing 21 Program to play 500 million hands to show you something kind of cool. We set up the House Rules, Number of Decks Used, Penetration Points and all the other variables. We set up different players to play this same hand a tad different to show you the results. This particular test is about Insurance. We decided to Card Count in one of the over 25 billion ways the Playing 21 Program allows. In this test, Player #2 and Player #7 both counted the cards the same. Player #2 only did one thing different from Player #7, and that was to Insure his hard 14 against the Dealers Ace, at the Count of Plus Ten (+10). It looks like this: (below see what it might look like in the Playing 21 Program).
Player's Hard 14 vs. Dealers Up Card Ace Player #2 Player #7
Shock Value Above we can see some very shocking information. The white column is the Net Players Wagers and the Blue Highlighted column is the Net Players Wagers Per Occurrence. These are likely the most important columns when looking at the Hand Breakdown vs. Dealers Up Card. If we look at each of the counts, we can see that they are very close to one another after 500 million rounds played. They should all be close, the two players are playing every count identical except the Yellow highlighted (It Says Yellow Highlighted) Plus Ten (+10) count.
That clearly is another example of the Hand Breakdown vs. Dealer Up Card and why it is coined the DNA of Blackjack. It saves you a lot of coin. We might like to check and see if the Plus 9 is also an Insurance Hand, maybe even Hitting this hand isn't the correct way to play it. We could set up one player to Surrender (Give) this same hand. We will prove to ourselves what is right, unlike years of having others feed us misleading information. If you did know this was the correct play at this count, that is great, and very likely because you already own our program. We have never seen Insuring a Hard 14 vs. the Dealers Ace anywhere, likely because they didn't have anything as powerful as the Playing 21 Program when they came out with their books. Why Should We Worry Why It Is Played This Way? Know How to Play Every Hand, What Is Right Bring It Into The Casinos, Use It Win Who Cares Why!!! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

the site. Trust me, once you agree with its absolute power, you’ll want what it can do for you! To purchase it, go to the top of the page where you will find
the word “Buy”. Click on it, and be amazed! 


Player
#2 Insured the Hard 14 vs. the Dealer's Ace at the count of Plus Ten
whereas Player #7 did not. We can see more details by expanding
the boxes above, and you will notice if you do that, at the count of Plus 10 after 500 million hands, Player #2 had received this hand 212,748 times while Player #7 received it 698 times less, or 212,050. That would be hard to compare if it wasn't so clearly laid out in the Per Occurrence column at the bottom. That is why we did it like this. Well, we do know Player #2 is doing the right thing (whatever it might be) at this count and Insuring this hand. Player #2 lost $30,260 less dollars at this one hand and this one count.
(If Player #7 would have had the hand 698 more times, making them both
play it the same number of times, Player #7 would have lost 698 x $6.59
= $4599 more still). 